|
Post by foley on Oct 30, 2003 7:23:24 GMT -5
Dr. Bernard Rimland, Director of the Autism Research Center, has sent the Feingold Association the following plea which affects all of us, not just those families having a child with autism: He writes: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) falsely claims there are no effective treatments for autism, despite the thousands of parents and physicians who can document great improvements in autistic children who have been given various perfectly safe nutritional supplements. There are, for example, twenty research studies on vitamin B6 and magnesium, published by researchers in six countries, which show significant improvement and no harm, in autistic children given B6 and magnesium. The FDA has for decades tried to suppress your right to purchase and use vitamins, so that you will be compelled to purchase harmful and expensive prescription drugs instead. Please read the letter from the American Association for Health Freedom located at www.autism.com/SenateBill , and then write, phone, and/or visit your U.S. Senators to urge them to vote against Senate Bill S. 722 ("the Dietary Supplement Safety Act"). A suggested form letter to write to your Senator and the names and phone numbers of all U.S. Senators is also located at this website. If this bill becomes law, say goodbye to your right to help your child and yourself with nutritional supplements.
|
|
|
Post by catatonic on Oct 30, 2003 7:45:52 GMT -5
Foley - Thank you for bringing this to everyone's attention. I would suggest that anyone interested in this issue take a look at the actual text of the bill, which is available at www.theorator.com/bills108/s722.html On the surface, it doesn't appear to be terribly sinister. It puts in place reporting procedures for bad reactions to dietary supplements. I'd think that's a good idea. However, the language of the bill (opening paragraph) states that adverse reactions must be reported even if they are "not causally related" to use of the supplement. What does this mean? I'm not sure, but it certainly does have the potential of being abused. I mean, if someone has a car accident and gets paralyzed while taking vitamins, does this get reported? If a bunch of people with stage 3 cancer take a supplement to bring them greater physical comfort and end up dying anyway, will that be used as ammunition to ban supplement sales? That's the part of the bill that concerns me, not the attempt to develop a data base useful in determining supplement safety. That's the part of the bill I am protesting in my letter to our senator. And I've made many, many copies so that others may share their concerns as well. If you don't want to mail a letter, you can find an email directory for the senate at www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
|
|